Post by account_disabled on Mar 10, 2024 21:45:33 GMT -6
Another case of assessment of the annual accounts could remove the mayor of the country's largest capital from the political table whose budget should exceed R billion. On the eve of the end of the fiscal year the news was occupied with the announcement that the Court of Auditors of the Municipality of São Paulo TCM-SP will be able to review the preliminary opinion on Mayor Ricardo Nunes' accounts for the fiscal year.
At the center of the controversy is the calculation of the minimum education expenses for December recorded in unprocessed unpaid balances. Members of the municipal management justified that Phone Number Data the measure is used by states and the Union. The TCM recognized that the process is complex and that the pandemic interfered with the municipality's accounts. The mayor's accounts for the - biennium are awaiting judgment from the São Paulo City Council both with prior opinions favorable to approval assessed by the TCM.
TCM-SPTCM-SP
To complicate things a little further the re-discussion of the preliminary opinion — at the current procedural stage — is an apparently innovative measure that comes to light after the mayor vetoed part of the bill proposed by the TCM-SP to significantly increase the maximum amount of fines that the body can impose which would be increased from R to R thousand increase of . The ceiling itself is not exorbitant compared to that practiced by the Federal Audit Court TCU in the amount of R thousand set based on the annual update based on the accumulated variation of the index used to correct the tax credits of the Unity.
The discussion about the mayor's accounts involves controversy of an accounting and legal nature that would deserve to undergo an impartial and independent analysis by the Public Prosecutor's Office specializing in public accounts constitutionally provided for to democratize the process and rule out possible bias or revanchism on the part of the judging body.
However the largest municipal budget in the country has the paradox of not being subject to impartial and independent examination by the law inspector which opens the door to a series of dysfunctions and deviations in the judgment and assessment of annual accounts.
But it is not just São Paulo's budget that is executed outside the law: this problem has also contaminated Rio's terrain. In on an initiative led by the Court of Auditors of the Municipality of Rio de Janeiro TCM-RJ the Public Ministry of Accounts in Rio was completely disfigured in its essence to the point of allowing prosecutors to be able to advocate privately and that commissioners intervened in the accounting process as pseudo-inspectors of the law in flagrant asymmetry in relation to the federal model required by the Constitution.
At the center of the controversy is the calculation of the minimum education expenses for December recorded in unprocessed unpaid balances. Members of the municipal management justified that Phone Number Data the measure is used by states and the Union. The TCM recognized that the process is complex and that the pandemic interfered with the municipality's accounts. The mayor's accounts for the - biennium are awaiting judgment from the São Paulo City Council both with prior opinions favorable to approval assessed by the TCM.
TCM-SPTCM-SP
To complicate things a little further the re-discussion of the preliminary opinion — at the current procedural stage — is an apparently innovative measure that comes to light after the mayor vetoed part of the bill proposed by the TCM-SP to significantly increase the maximum amount of fines that the body can impose which would be increased from R to R thousand increase of . The ceiling itself is not exorbitant compared to that practiced by the Federal Audit Court TCU in the amount of R thousand set based on the annual update based on the accumulated variation of the index used to correct the tax credits of the Unity.
The discussion about the mayor's accounts involves controversy of an accounting and legal nature that would deserve to undergo an impartial and independent analysis by the Public Prosecutor's Office specializing in public accounts constitutionally provided for to democratize the process and rule out possible bias or revanchism on the part of the judging body.
However the largest municipal budget in the country has the paradox of not being subject to impartial and independent examination by the law inspector which opens the door to a series of dysfunctions and deviations in the judgment and assessment of annual accounts.
But it is not just São Paulo's budget that is executed outside the law: this problem has also contaminated Rio's terrain. In on an initiative led by the Court of Auditors of the Municipality of Rio de Janeiro TCM-RJ the Public Ministry of Accounts in Rio was completely disfigured in its essence to the point of allowing prosecutors to be able to advocate privately and that commissioners intervened in the accounting process as pseudo-inspectors of the law in flagrant asymmetry in relation to the federal model required by the Constitution.